|
What prevents us to have a lot of money? Money as the equivalent energy. The category of "money" is considered different disciplines: from the point of view of the economy, money is the equivalent of the product from the point of view of sociology - the equivalent of communication, and in terms of psychology can be regarded as the equivalent of energy.
This is what we are talking with psychologist Irina Shkolnik.
Man grows harvest - spending power, the other is fishing - also spends energy. Previously, it was simple: people exchanged their expended energy. Then, for convenience as the equivalent of the energy we come up with the money.
But, anyway, the money is energy. Much depends, in whose hands would this energy: creator or destroyer. And if a person does not personally grown up a lot of money, then a large sum in his hands, as a rule, turns into a tragedy.
Since the money - it's the relationship between people, this social energy, and if a person wants to live in society and not be a hermit in the desert, without them it is unlikely to be happy and successful. Of course, each of us he puts his strap and amount.
When the consciousness is "yes", and the subconscious mind "VS"
- Are there people who do not want to have a lot of money?
- There are people who do not know what they do not want money - immediately taken aback me the answer Irina. - Man actually has something that he wants to have. We see money as the energy, and the person, "an example of" this or that amount (by testing the amount of this energy for yourself), begins to experience certain feelings. Very often it is fear, shame and guilt. They block the energy of money.
- In general, all clear, but the singing Kortnev: "... what exactly do you mean?"
- Let's start with the fact that the category of money is cultural aspect, which is based on the outlook, passed down from generation to generation, and form the inner beliefs about money. And these beliefs can be put on a subconscious level, and sometimes people are not even aware of them.
That is consciousness says that money is needed for happiness and a man ready for them, but in the subconscious mind (or rather, unconsciousness) laid a negative attitude toward money, and subconsciously he does not want to be rich.
Because a lot of money - this is a great test and a great responsibility. This is a fundamentally different way of life unknown. Some simply good to be in the position of the victim when you're poor, you feel sorry for all the help and you do not make claims.
- How it formed a negative attitude toward money, which then interferes with our minds?
- Each of us is growing in a particular environment that forms from an early age to do with money - so to say, creates a certain "way of money." For example, laid in childhood idiom "to be poor - the norm" can subconsciously block the "channel" receipt. That is, if a person grew up in a poor family, and he was in her comfortable, at the subconscious level, for him to become rich is to bring home to him the way of life.
A few runs reluctance to accept responsibility or to change anything, "Better bad, but as usual," - says their subconscious. Another example: very common purely cultural stereotype of "big money honestly did not come", which also prevents the rich. This is a legacy of a bygone system.
- But we can not agree that the large amounts of capital in this country in an honest way to make money, in fact, almost impossible.
- The fact that this cultural aspect and materialized relevant situation in the country. And if you change the stereotype, and the situation will be different. Of course, today there are people who "are not infected," such thoughts, and they have a solid money earned quite honestly.
Money Be Prepared! - ALWAYS READY!
- Can anyone become rich?
- Yes, but at what cost ... If a person is determined to get a lot of money, it must first find out to know that he is ready for it or not? - I decided not to stop at the last saying of my companion, as it was too profound.
- And what he needed the money? What will he do with them?
- I think the goal at all about the same. For example, give a child education, helping parents ... You know, the man is so constituted that if he declares in the first place not their own needs, the energy he had to make money does not go - immediately "diagnoses" Irina. - It is self-deception. At the heart of making primarily on the personal needs. How can I meet someone, if he is not satisfied?
- It turns out, the money associated with selfishness - I was disappointed sums.
- With a healthy selfishness! And it is normal when a person accumulates capital base.
- For example, I decided that I needed the money. What to do? How do you know I'm ready to wealth or not? Money will bring me good or harm?
- With the development of imagination, you can play the game. Imagine that the desired amount is already here and now. Your actions? With whom do you share the news? Will it be your social circle? Analyze your own actions from beginning to end. Now think what emotions you have caused this "procedure".
Shall describe how you want to use
money (where you spend it), and then check against the result with Abraham Maslow pyramid "human needs". Determine at what levels of the pyramid, you have concentrated their capital.
For example, you decide to 60% of the money spent on the publication of his book, 30% - to invest in the shares of the company of interest to you, and the rest - was postponed for "rainy day". This means that your needs are focused on self-expression, the satisfaction of self-worth, and the remaining needs - physiological and safety (home insurance) - you ignore.
We can say that in the end the quality of your life will not change. In addition, you have programmed yourself to "rainy day". Man is so constituted that he must first meet the basic physiological needs, then - the need for stability, security, etc.
And if you are distributing capital disregarded any component of the pyramid -
then you are not ready for the money
.
Perhaps you are just shy of their needs or ignore them, and in this case the necessary psychological correction.
Interview with a psychologist Irina Shkolnik
|
