I - spender and I like it!

Entertaining turned my correspondence with an interesting lady.

First letter. Catherine writes:

Dear Gennady! Urgent help me! This is not a drill! This cry from the heart! Day, imagine the whole day - I can not find any reasons why the money is not important. What to do?

I answered:

Hello Catherine, and you have people ask around. Maybe they can help.

Katherine was gone for a couple of weeks. And today I get a letter from her.

Read: Good day! I am very glad to chat with you again, Gennady! Results of work with the theme of "Money."

So, I decided to poll the audience to share, "the bish" its environment into several groups. As a result, it gave me nothing, because "No one clever thoughts on this matter has been received from any person," almost all think the same way regardless of the amount of the phenomenon of "money."

By this criteria, "UMO conclusions" - you "UMO conclusions." After talking with the people of all kinds, rich, poor, in business, and so on, I discovered the following:

- First complete misunderstanding of items!

It feels like no one ever on this subject and did not think. And a clone of the side - in any other, but not in the direction of money. Many are satisfied with this state of what is, and why. And in truth what?

There are people who just oud put themselves in such a position that it is necessary to make, you see there are incentives (loans, etc.). Many (mostly wealthy) people have already developed, stable life - quiet and measured, the same way (would not like me so).

By the way, I have one friend - a Swiss banker. When we met him, I was "corporate war" involved (how to take strategic controversial property). He told me then:

- Kate, here you are so smart, beautiful, why do you need all this? This is dangerous, difficult walking on the razor's edge. And I so interested in all this was (adventuress I "did not finish" ... not more "altered").

In general, life - a fountain. So, it took several years (he opened a branch of the bank in Ukraine ") and calls me, all this" in the saliva "of happiness - for advice. It turns out that he faced "problematic" property, and had to deal with these "war games." All such awful "shook-happy."

I helped him, of course, a week later he calls me back from Switzerland, and shouts into the phone - Kate, I'll be in the next week, I have a couple of projects on the "controversial" property - let's work.

So tell me, a grown man ... ... held a house in Switzerland (where in the mountains), family, children. In general, all the "super-duper". Well che "not ymetsya" peasant, Ahh? Well, you sit there, the mountain air "sniff", no! He corporate wars Give!

Now I want to understand the basic "problems" of people in a relationship with money (Those which have admitted at least.

1. For all not acceptable "squandering" (while everyone puts their meaning in this concept).

What is it for me? It's a waste of money on "unnecessary" things. What is "unnecessary" things? But this is an interesting question. If buying a thing "here and now" I enjoy it "here and now", and then even forget about these things, then what is it?

"I do not need" things or "correct thing"? Or, for example, doing shopping, I buy up "relatively" everything (but losing weight "happiness" :-) 2 kg. It is "not right"?

But for me personally it is "necessary"! - I have a lot of things, and to say that any of them to me, "do not need" - I can not.

Where is the criterion "necessity" and "not necessity"? and who set it?

Now I have about 500 pairs of shoes, and they gave me all the "necessary". Yes, all 500 pairs. Based on the general logic - I'm a spender.

No, I certainly can not live by the rule: - 1 pair of shoes; - 1 pair of boots; - 1 pair of shoes; - 1 pair of sandals. Yeah, I forgot ... more 1 pair 'Dress Shoes "(ie shoes" output "), to yield a pancake just - I'm no vkuril ??? And why? Why should I live?

And anyway, why should I have someone that's got to? (this way also a topic for discussion. If someone gives me a loan, for example, why he does it? Not just just for the beautiful eyes. So why I told him to be? (except of course the return of "the same" and "Term").

In general, the question I have more questions than answers. Okay, then ... strictly by points.

2. manage the money need to "correct"

In my understanding, this item is closely intertwined with claim 1. again, "What is the right - WRONG" Where is the criterion?

For example, if a person has a $ 10 million - that he can afford to live in the house for $ 2 million - and at us it is considered a "correct"

If, it has 2 million, he can not live in the house for 2 million - have we considered "not right."

Why is that? I personally do not understand. If you want to - so let them live "health". It all depends on personal priorities. I, for example, there is a familiar one, and so it has a very modest income, but the cream under her eyes are always the best! (in this case it will restrict your diet, but in cosmetics - NEVER).

So from the point of view of society - she lives "not right." Eat my child have to eat ... and grow ... Only here GROWTH expanse of the way! And there can not be any general rules that every man is set for the rights and prioritize.

Someone collects the clock on the half-million dollars, some rare books with precious bindings, and some seashells. And all these people - exactly the same level of income. Why can not surround yourself with beautiful, expensive things, why ??? Why not enjoy the money, and repeat the whole life - money Evil money destroy people, the world.

It's problems of these people, this world, but not mine own, right? PROBLEMS THAT PEOPLE ARE LED (So there! Finally the "doperlo"), and not the money.

I - spender and I like it!

Entertaining turned my correspondence with an interesting lady.

First letter. Catherine writes:

Dear Gennady! Urgent help me! This is not a drill! This cry from the heart! Day, imagine the whole day - I can not find any reasons why the money is not important. What to do?

I answered:

Hello Catherine, and you have people ask around. Maybe they can help.

Katherine was gone for a couple of weeks. And today I get a letter from her.

Read: Good day! I am very glad to chat with you again, Gennady! Results of work with the theme of "Money."

So, I decided to poll the audience to share, "the bish" its environment into several groups. As a result, it gave me nothing, because "No one clever thoughts on this matter has been received from any person," almost all think the same way regardless of the amount of the phenomenon of "money."

By this criteria, "UMO conclusions" - you "UMO conclusions." After talking with the people of all kinds, rich, poor, in business, and so on, I discovered the following:

- First complete misunderstanding of items!

It feels like no one ever on this subject and did not think. And a clone of the side - in any other, but not in the direction of money. Many are satisfied with this state of what is, and why. And in truth what?

There are people who just oud put themselves in such a position that it is necessary to make, you see there are incentives (loans, etc.). Many (mostly wealthy) people have already developed, stable life - quiet and measured, the same way (would not like me so).

By the way, I have one friend - a Swiss banker. When we met him, I was "corporate war" involved (how to take strategic controversial property). He told me then:

- Kate, here you are so smart, beautiful, why do you need all this? This is dangerous, difficult walking on the razor's edge. And I so interested in all this was (adventuress I "did not finish" ... not more "altered").

In general, life - a fountain. So, it took several years (he opened a branch of the bank in Ukraine ") and calls me, all this" in the saliva "of happiness - for advice. It turns out that he faced "problematic" property, and had to deal with these "war games." All such awful "shook-happy."

I helped him, of course, a week later he calls me back from Switzerland, and shouts into the phone - Kate, I'll be in the next week, I have a couple of projects on the "controversial" property - let's work.

So tell me, a grown man ... ... held a house in Switzerland (where in the mountains), family, children. In general, all the "super-duper". Well che "not ymetsya" peasant, Ahh? Well, you sit there, the mountain air "sniff", no! He corporate wars Give!

Now I want to understand the basic "problems" of people in a relationship with money (Those which have admitted at least.

1. For all not acceptable "squandering" (while everyone puts their meaning in this concept).

What is it for me? It's a waste of money on "unnecessary" things. What is "unnecessary" things? But this is an interesting question. If buying a thing "here and now" I enjoy it "here and now", and then even forget about these things, then what is it?

"I do not need" things or "correct thing"? Or, for example, doing shopping, I buy up "relatively" everything (but losing weight "happiness" :-) 2 kg. It is "not right"?

But for me personally it is "necessary"! - I have a lot of things, and to say that any of them to me, "do not need" - I can not.

Where is the criterion "necessity" and "not necessity"? and who set it?

Now I have about 500 pairs of shoes, and they gave me all the "necessary". Yes, all 500 pairs. Based on the general logic - I'm a spender.

No, I certainly can not live by the rule: - 1 pair of shoes; - 1 pair of boots; - 1 pair of shoes; - 1 pair of sandals. Yeah, I forgot ... more 1 pair 'Dress Shoes "(ie shoes" output "), to yield a pancake just - I'm no vkuril ??? And why? Why should I live?

And anyway, why should I have someone that's got to? (this way also a topic for discussion. If someone gives me a loan, for example, why he does it? Not just just for the beautiful eyes. So why I told him to be? (except of course the return of "the same" and "Term").

In general, the question I have more questions than answers. Okay, then ... strictly by points.

2. manage the money need to "correct"

In my understanding, this item is closely intertwined with claim 1. again, "What is the right - WRONG" Where is the criterion?

For example, if a person has a $ 10 million - that he can afford to live in the house for $ 2 million - and at us it is considered a "correct"

If, it has 2 million, he can not live in the house for 2 million - have we considered "not right."

Why is that? I personally do not understand. If you want to - so let them live "health". It all depends on personal priorities. I, for example, there is a familiar one, and so it has a very modest income, but the cream under her eyes are always the best! (in this case it will restrict your diet, but in cosmetics - NEVER).

So from the point of view of society - she lives "not right." Eat my child have to eat ... and grow ... Only here GROWTH expanse of the way! And there can not be any general rules that every man is set for the rights and prioritize.

Someone collects the clock on the half-million dollars, some rare books with precious bindings, and some seashells. And all these people - exactly the same level of income. Why can not surround yourself with beautiful, expensive things, why ??? Why not enjoy the money, and repeat the whole life - money Evil money destroy people, the world.

It's problems of these people, this world, but not mine own, right? PROBLEMS THAT PEOPLE ARE LED (So there! Finally the "doperlo"), and not the money.