Table of contents
|
What financial reality you choose?
|
Page 2
|
Financial reality, the financial world - is the set of economic policies that you choose and who you follow.
Simply put, the financial reality - this is your way, this is your way to earn a living.
After some thought, I was able to distinguish two separate ways and another option, which is a kind of symbiosis between the first and second.
Everything, as in fairy tales: "The right to go - death will find, to the left - the horse will lose, right - something else third." All paths are the same, each has its pros and cons. You choose. Thus, reveal the card.
Ask yourself: "What do I pay? "I am sure that there are two possible answers:
* For your efforts;
* For the benefit (or value) that you create for others.
Your answer - it's your choice own financial path. Let's look at these two roads a little more detail.
1. You get paid for their efforts.
If you read between the lines, it becomes clear that you are - the person receiving a salary (even higher). More often than not, in this case a large part of your salary - a salary rate or something else like that.
In this way has its advantages:
* You define the purpose of your activity (you do not have a headache about what to do);
* You promise to pay the money, you promise economic stability;
* You are required not so much the results as a certain level of effort (you always able to say that you tried very hard);
* If you continue to make an effort, then your financial risks are minimized.
Most people are happy with this situation. This so-called "safe option", which elects the vast majority of people. I myself believe that such a path is not bad for a start - to get used to life and to understand what you want from it.
However, this path has its limitations, and quite significant.
Meditate on what do they consist of? As we can see, choosing the first option, we shoot with the lion's share of responsibility, we reduce their risks to a minimum (basically - it's great). What we can not meet this way:
* The objectives of your activity is determined for you;
* Your level of income - is a stable amount, but it is far from the limit of your capabilities;
* By choosing this path, you get used to put the responsibility for their actions;
* The path does not stimulate you to give 100%, it does not stimulate your growth (as an individual);
* Often, with this approach - you have limited management capabilities, limited choices;
If you're satisfied with these limitations - you can happily continue to go this way ...
The rest, I'll tell you about other ways ...
2. You receive payment for your contribution (value benefit)
Terms of the game at the same time completely different. You will never be able to say, "I tried as best I could. I give 100%. " It is absolutely nobody cares. This fiscal path is much harder, but it provides appropriate compensation.
So, what are the requirements in this way?
* You choose the direction;
* You and only you are responsible for you created value;
* It is important not invested efforts and created benefits (while efforts should try to invest as little as possible - and it is difficult).
* You are all risks associated with the choice of direction (maybe you create the value of no use to anybody - the main mistake you can make in this model);
Let's look at a specific example.
|